Ливийские повстанцы захватили сына Каддафи Сейфа аль-Ислама

mahri92:

ne ponyala kakoy prıdurok na mınus nazal,otlıçnaya tema,ne dolzny ze byt vse temy o lubvı  

😆 geregin plyus bolsyn

ilamanyo:

mahri92:

ne ponyala kakoy prıdurok na mınus nazal,otlıçnaya tema,ne dolzny ze byt vse temy o lubvı  

😆 geregin plyus bolsyn

Liviyada dagajak oydyan

mahri92:

ilamanyo:

mahri92:

ne ponyala kakoy prıdurok na mınus nazal,otlıçnaya tema,ne dolzny ze byt vse temy o lubvı  

geregin plyus bolsyn

ony mana berenokalar,obşıy tema üçin basypdy bırı,nemnozko ponervnıçıla

ne nervnichay, chalt garrarsyn 🙂 sowjak kola ich, gowy edya sho 🙂 😎

http://konservatizm.org/konservatizm/geopolitika/130510110039.xhtml

http://www.intrepidreport.com/archives/2683

ASMARA, Eritrea—The lies used to justify the NATO war against Libya
have surpassed those created to justify the invasion of Iraq. Amnesty
International and Human Rights Watch both had honest observers on the
ground for months following the rebellion in eastern Libya and both have
repudiated every major charge used to justify the NATO war on Libya.
According to the Amnesty observer, who is fluent in Arabic, there is
not one confirmed instance of rape by the pro-Gadaffi fighters, not even
a doctor who knew of one. All the Viagra mass rape stories were
fabrications.
Amnesty could not verify a single “African mercenary” fighting for
Gaddafi story, and the highly charged international satellite television
accounts of African mercenaries raping women that were used to panic
much of the eastern Libyan population into fleeing their homes were
fabrications.
There were no confirmed accounts of helicopter gunships attacking
civilians and no jet fighters bombing people, which completely
invalidates any justification for the No-Fly Zone inSecurity Council
resolution used as an excuse for NATO to launch its attacks on Libya.
After three months on the ground in rebel-controlled territory, the
Amnesty investigator could only confirm 110 deaths in Benghazi which
included Gadaffi supporters.
Only 110 dead in Benghazi? Wait a minute, we were told thousands had
died there, ten thousand even. No, only 110 lost their lives including
pro-government people.
No rapes, no African mercenaries, no helicopter gunships or bombers,
and only 110 deaths prior to the launch of the NATO bombing campaign;
every claim was based on a lie.
Today, according to the Libyan Red Crescent Society, over 1,100
civilians have been killed by NATO bombs, including over 400 women and
children. Over 6,000 Libyan civilians have been injured or wounded by
the bombing, many very seriously.
Compared to the war on Iraq, these numbers are tiny, but the reasons for the Libyan war have no merit in any form.
Saddam Hussein was evil, he invaded his neighbors in wars that killed
up to a million. He used weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in the form
of poison gas on both his neighbors and his own people, killing tens of
thousands. He was brutal and corrupt and when American tanks rolled into
Iraq, the Iraqi people refused to fight for him, simply putting down
their weapons and going home.
Libya under Col. Gadaffi hasn’t invaded their neighbors. Gadaffi
never used WMD on anyone, let alone his own people. As for Gadaffi being
brutal, in Libya’s neighbor, Algeria, the Algerian military fought a
counterinsurgency for a decade in the 1990s that witnessed the deaths of
some 200,000 Algerians. Now that is brutal and nothing anywhere near
this has happened in Libya.
In Egypt and Tunisia, Western puppets like Mubarak and Ben Ali had
almost no support amongst their people with few, if any, willing to
fight and die to defend them.
The majority of the Libyan people are rallying behind the Libyan
government and “the leader,” Muammar Gadaffi, with over one million
people demonstrating in support on July 1 in Tripoli, the capital of
Libya. Thousands of Libyan youth are on the front lines fighting the
rebels and ,despite thousands of NATO air strikes, authentic journalists
on the ground in western Libya report their morale remains high.
In Egypt, the popular explosion that resulted in the army seizing
power from Mubarak began in the very poorest neighborhoods in Cairo and
other Egyptian cities where the price of basic food items, like bread,
sugar and cooking oil, had skyrocketed and led to widespread hunger. In
many parts of Egypt’s poor neighborhoods, gasoline/benzene is easier to
find then clean drinking water. Medical care and education is only for
those with the money to pay for it. Life for the people of Tunisia is
not that much better.
In contrast, the Libyan people have the longest life expectancy in
the Arab world. The Libyan people have the best, free public health
system in the Arab world. The Libyan people have the best, free public
education system in the Arab world. Most Libyan families own their own
home and most Libyan families own their own automobile. Libya is so much
better off than its neighbors that every year tens of thousands of
Egyptians and Tunisians migrated to Libya to earn money to feed their
families, doing the dirty work the Libyan people refused to do.
When it comes to how Gadaffi oversaw a dramatic rise in the standard
of living for the Libyan people, despite decades of UN inSecurity
Council sanctions against the Libyan economy, honest observers
acknowledge that Gadaffi stands head and shoulders above the kings,
sheiks, emirs and various dictators who rule the rest of the Arab world.
So why did NATO launch this war against Libya?
First of all, Gadaffi was on the verge of creating a new banking
system that was going to put the IMF, World Bank and assorted other
Western banksters out of business in Africa. No more predatory Western
loans used to cripple African economies, instead, a $42 billion dollar
African Investment Bank would be supplying major loans at little or even
zero interest rates.
LIbya has funded major infrastructure projects across Africa that
have begun to link up African economies and break the perpetual
dependency on the Western countries for imports have been taking place.
Here in Eritrea the new road connecting Eritrea and Sudan is just one
small example.
What seems to have finally tipped the balance in favor of direct
Western military intervention was the reported demand by Gadaffi that
the USA oil companies, which have long been major players in the Libyan
petroleum industry, were going to have to compensate Libya to the tune
of tens of billions of dollars for the damage done to the Libyan economy
by the USA instigated “Lockerbie Bombing” sanctions imposed by the UN
inSecurity Council throughout the 1990s into early 2000s. This is based
on the unearthing of evidence that the CIA paid millions of dollars to
witnesses in the Lockerbie Bombing trial to change their stories to
implicate Libya which was used as the basis for the very damaging UN
sanctions against Libya. The government of the USA lied and damaged
Libya so the USA oil companies were going to have to pay up to cover the
cost of their government’s actions. Not hard to see why Gadaffi had to
go, is it?
Add the fact that Gadaffi had signaled clearly that he saw both
Libya’s and Africa’s future economic development linked more to China
and Russia rather than the west and it was just a matter of time before
the CIA’s contingency plan to overthrow the Libyan government was put on
the front burner.
NATO’s war against Libya has much more in common with NATO’s Kosovo
war against Serbia. But one still cannot compare Gadaffi to Saddam or
even the much smaller criminals in the Serbian leadership. The Libyan
War lies are worse than Iraq.
Stay tuned to Inteprid Report for more news that the so-called free press in the West refuses to cover.
Thomas C. Mountain is the only independent western journalist in
the Horn of Africa, living and reporting from Eritrea since 2006. He was
a member of the 1st US Peace Delegation to Libya in 1987.

Capello o beren linkyndaky kitabyn ichinde gowy zatlar bar welin yone ady agzalan sosiologlaryn hemmesi radikal pikirlenyan adamlar. K. Marks. Huntington ..

ilamanyo munyny azajyk terjimesini goymaly ekenin

Free:
Capello o beren linkyndaky kitabyn ichinde gowy zatlar bar welin yone ady agzalan sosiologlaryn hemmesi radikal pikirlenyan adamlar. K. Marks. Huntington ..

Sen olaryň pikirleri-idealogiýalary bilen näme işiň bar, esasy zat berýän maglumatlaryna seret. Hemme zat sanlar bilen subut edilýär.  Olar Marksist ýa-da olar ýewreý diýip olaryň aýdýan zatlaryna üns bermeli däl diýen zat ýokdyra.

mahri92:

ne ponyala kakoy prıdurok na mınus nazal,otlıçnaya tema,ne dolzny ze byt vse temy o lubvı  

mahrishka ya tebe + dam...

black_orch:

mahri92:

ne ponyala kakoy prıdurok na mınus nazal,otlıçnaya tema,ne dolzny ze byt vse temy o lubvı  

mahrishka ya tebe + dam...